By US Representative
Wayne Gilchrest
It is my great pleasure to be given an opportunity
to share with you my vision for the Chesapeake Bay and for the importance
of water quality to the aquatic ecosystems that Waterkeepers across
the nation are working to protect and restore. To paraphrase the recent
findings of the Chesapeake Bay Blue Ribbon Panel, "…there
will never be another time when restored waterways are more achievable,
or less expensive, than right now."
The declining health of the
Chesapeake Bay is well-documented: "dead
zones," where oxygen levels are too low to support crabs and fish,
are expanding, oyster populations are just two percent of historic
numbers, and submerged aquatic vegetation continues to decline. The
major culprit is water quality degradation due to excessive nutrients
and sediments. Sources of these pollutants include municipal and industrial
wastewater, runoff associated with certain agricultural practices and
urban sprawl, and atmospheric deposition.
However, the root of the problem lies with our land
use and population growth in the watershed. Each year 100,000
additional people call the Bay watershed home and 100 acres of open
space and forests are lost each day. The result is overburdened sewage
treatment facilities and increased stormwater runoff from new housing
developments, shopping centers, and roads, with additional costs for
mitigation and reversal of subsequent environmental damage.
In 1983 the
Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) was created to coordinate the Bay cleanup
effort. It is a regional partnership that includes the states of Maryland,
Virginia, and Pennsylvania; the District of Columbia; the Chesapeake
Bay Commission (a tri-state legislative body); and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) for the federal government. The CBP has been
hailed as a model for its coordination of local, state, and Federal
stakeholders.
In 2000 the CBP set specific reductions of nutrients
and
sediment that must be met by 2010 for each major tributary. Although
a great deal of progress has been made in reducing nutrient loads to
the Bay, we still have a long way to go and only a few years to meet
the 2010 goals.
Local governments are at the front lines of the cleanup
effort, and are uniquely situated to implement actions that will restore
the water quality in the Bay. There are over 1,650 local governments
throughout the Bay watershed, and each has statutory authority over land
use, stormwater management, and water and sewer management. Associated
with these responsibilities are heavy burdens related to financing, technical
expertise, and education.
I am working with local governments and other
stakeholders in the Chesapeake Bay restoration effort to improve federal
support for local Bay clean-up efforts for the immediate future and beyond
the CBP 2010 deadline.
As chairman of the House Resources Subcommittee
on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans, I held a field hearing
in December to learn more about the challenges local governments face
and the opportunities they can bring to ultimate Bay restoration. The
issues are complicated and varied and include the influence of land use
and atmospheric deposition on nutrient loading; the consequences (both
ecological and from a human health perspective) of introducing non-native
oysters to the Bay; the role menhaden play in water quality; the status
of developing and implementing Tributary Strategies; and the impediments
local governments encounter in addressing all of these.
These
challenges will only grow more complex and costly to address with time.
However, with the help and enthusiasm of our Waterkeepers and other
stakeholders, I feel confident about what we can achieve together to
meet these challenges and to more effectively integrate growing human
infrastructure needs with nature’s
infrastructure.
|
 U.S. Rep. Wayne Gilchrest represents Maryland's Eastern Shore
|