By Long Island Soundkeeper Terry Backer CONNECTICUT
STATE ASSEMBLY (Democrat, 121st District)
What are the politics
of water? Where is the greatest threat to the
environment? And what will it take to stem the flood of regressive political
actions in the increasingly complex battleground of courts, shifting
laws, international trade agreements, executive orders, and state and
local rulemaking?
Waterkeepers come from all different walks of life with different family
and
economic histories, political leanings, and regional conceptions of the
world. There is, however, a common thread among Waterkeepers that sticks
out like a bright red fiber on a gray flannel background. That commonality
is a commitment to protect our life-sustaining environment and enhance
the place where we all live. Waterkeepers also share the idea that their
individual efforts will coalesce together into a blanket of protections
across the nation and world. Waterkeepers share the methods and tools
they deploy to achieve the goals of a clean, productive, and livable
world. These long-standing tools, created by government, are threatened
by polluters with an aggressive political agenda to shelve them away.
In order to help stem the tide, environmentalists need to be more diverse
in their approach to getting things done, or not done, as some cases
may be. It is time for Waterkeepers and people of a similar ilk to take
the plunge into being citizen legislators.
Waterkeepers can respond or act proactively to applications, proposals,
and dramatic events that impact our waters with creativity and the tools
our laws provide. They now, however, have to fight the battle on many
fronts including a changing political landscape at all levels of government.
The political landscape is always in flux. Laws that provide protection
for our natural life support system can be erased or weakened by legislative
changes or executive orders that often go unnoticed by the public. The
streams of bills on federal, state, and local levels are refreshed each
session cycle; some are positive, some have possibilities, and others
are hurtful. The Clean Water Act and other federal bodies of law are
under constant attack from various interest groups. Executive orders
can nullify the effects of protective measures and in many cases the
citizens are none the wiser.
A Waterkeeper’s greatest asset is the people’s desire for
a world with clean air and water. Most polls show that the public overwhelmingly
supports strong environmental laws including provisions for citizens’ empowerment,
as in the citizen suit provision of the Clean Water Act. Enlightened
laws like these make it possible for Waterkeepers to do their job. The
public supports protection and enhancement of the environment. But in
the daily toil of life, the public misses the cleverly veiled attacks
on protections. In legislatures across the country, the climate that
promotes the rolling back of protections is at an all time high. The
environmental protections passed into law in the 1970s would not even
get a reading in the Congress of today.
Entering my seventh term as a State Legislator in Connecticut, and being
Soundkeeper for Long Island Sound, I have some perspectives on the legislative
process. In a word or two - it ain’t easy. Anyone who has made
the transition from either direction (coming from a policymaking wing
of government to being a Waterkeeper, or from a Waterkeeper to government)
will instantly recognize the different ground rules and responsibilities
for the different roles. Performing both duties concurrently adds to
the complexity. No longer afforded the luxury to say I love or hate any
proposal, I am now compelled to ask deeper questions. Whatever I decide
can’t be singularly ideological; it must be functional. Producing
legislation that will pass on the floor, be signed by the Governor, and
work as law is both the
burden and opportunity facing a citizen legislator.
This means stepping
into a crossfire. It is a task and a challenge that would cause Solomon
to pull his hair out.
When you’re a public servant as well as
a Waterkeeper, you do not fit in well with the "group-think" of
your peers. In simple terms, you’re neither in nor out. To the enviros,
you have compromised too much; to industry and to government, you are a
kook in a canoe. So why in the world would any Waterkeeper want to run
for office? It’s
simple: when properly done you have more of the wheel in your hands
to steer the ship where you know it needs to go.
Many years ago
I came to understand that as a Waterkeeper born and raised on Long Island
Sound, the fate of the Sound was not crafted on my lobster boat or even
in our Soundkeeper office, but one hundred miles north in the State Capitol.
The Capitol is where laws are written in pencil, to be erased and redrafted
at the will of those elected. I understood the threat that faced our hard-earned
environmental protection tools and laws. Waterkeepers fight pollution
squarely based on the rule of law. And Waterkeepers can only use
the laws that the government allows us to have. That is not to
underestimate the power and value of citizens lobbying, but what
can take years to do from the outside can often be accomplished
in a matter of minutes from the inside. The ability to head off
a bad idea on the elevator between the third and fifth floors is
invaluable in terms of both recourse and objectives. I would venture
to say that some of the best work I have done for the Sound is
what never happened, was never seen – a battle that
never needed to be fought.
During the last general election, many
ballot propositions across the nation proposing spending on local parks
or environmental infrastructure improvements were overwhelmingly successful.
The Trust for Public Land calculates that nationwide this past November,
voters approved seventy five percent of conservation ballot measures.
The success of these measures is a clear indication that when the public
knows what is needed, they respond favorably.
In some cases, however,
these high profile ballot issues may mask the insidious gnawing away
of the broader habitat and environmental protection that is taking
place in Washington D.C. and in State Houses. Americans support well-reasoned
and workable environmental protections, but often fail to track performance
after they have cast their vote. None of us has the time to study
in depth all the things that come from a legislature, so bills with
nice-sounding names can deceive many a voter. The best place to help
kill these bills, or fight for good ones, is to be one of the people
writing the policy and making the law. As with all things political,
there are pluses and minuses, balances to be struck, and compromises
to be made. If you choose this course, be willing to pay the price.
A Waterkeeper/Legislator has a balancing act to achieve that often
leaves friends in the environmental movement perplexed. It doesn’t
take long before words like "co-opted" are heard after your
name. As a Legislator, you have a much larger picture to look at. Nothing
can be taken on face value. As a legislator, you have to get fifty
percent plus one vote to win anything, a requirement advocates are
not bound to. To do that, you have to develop the necessary political
skills of give and take. Like most things, politics are as much about
personal relationships as they are about ideas. In essence, it’s
about being trusted by your colleagues – even those who don’t
share your vision. You’ll find soon enough that John Muir was
correct when, in a way of speaking, he said, that when we try to pick
out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything in the universe.
This is true in the web of social, economic, and political issues that
a legislator faces everyday. You can no longer look at things as singular,
but rather as a component of a larger social fabric. However, if thoughtfully
done, using facts, informed persuasion, and doing your homework, you
can become the person in the legislature who is considered the "expert" by
your peers. If you reach that status, the road can open before
you. Yes, it will take compromise. (I believe I used to call it "selling
out.")
Accomplishing goals may come in small increments, but after
all, you can’t swallow a watermelon whole - you have to cut it
into small pieces.
All in all, I believe it is time for more Waterkeepers
and citizens who share our vision to make this move. Just remember,
no one is one dimensional. You bring your opinions and ideas
with you, even ones that may offend people who have supported
you and your organization for years. You are going to tick
someone off, but the outcome for our living planet is more
important than your organization losing a member or two. I
have had frustrations and headaches, victories and painful
losses, made friends and lost friends, but I have been where
I needed to be to protect the environment. My father, God rest
his soul, always said the other half of life is being in the
right place at the right time. Its time for more Waterkeepers
and other thoughtful people to be seated in the decision-making
bodies of our nation[s]. The time is right and critical.
|
Soundkeeper
On
the floor of the Connecticut State Assembly
|