Act of Imagination In fall 2007 three founding members of Waterkeeper Alliance — John Cronin (former Hudson Riverkeeper), Terry Backer (Long Island Soundkeeper) and Andy Willner (New York/New Jersey Baykeeper) — sat down with Waterkeeper to discuss the founding and future of the Waterkeeper movement. Andy Willner: There was a reason, primarily John’s vision, that we decided to come together as Waterkeeper Alliance. People should know something about what that vision was and why we did it. Terry Backer: If you skip over how John came to Hudson Riverkeeper and the Hudson River Fishermen’s Association, then you skip over the heart of what Waterkeepers are all about — people and their sense of place, their sense of ownership. John Cronin: Yes, but I can’t take credit for it. The idea that came out of the Hudson River Fishermen’s Association and Bob Boyle, who wrote about it in his first Hudson River book in the 1960s called Hudson River: A Natural and Unnatural History. Tom Whyatt was the first Hudson Riverkeeper in 1972. My first job on the Hudson was for the Clearwater organization. I worked with Tom on a project called Pipe Watch in 1973 investigating polluters to see if they were complying with their brand new Clean Water Act permits. Cronin: It is a little bit of both. The idea behind the Public Trust Doctrine is not that anybody can do anything they want. The idea is that nobody can do anything that alienates anyone else. So, in that sense, it is a community right, but it is also an individual right that we’re not supposed to be tromping on. Willner: It comes from a tradition in common law that your neighbors are not supposed to devalue your property by their actions. Waterways are public property. So when the public agencies, the trustees, don’t take care of the property then it is up to the public to take a stand. It’s a fairly straightforward concept. Backer: But it comes back to the same theme. I live here and if I don’t have a right to do it, who does? If I don’t have a responsibility to do it, who does? Willner: Responsibility is a big part of this. Not only are we enforcing our rights as citizens to access clean water and edible fish, we are also advocating for the public’s right to clean water. It’s pretty straightforward stuff. Cronin: When the Riverkeeper program started, all we had were all the horrors around us. We didn’t have any model. Willner: When I started doing this I just assumed that we were going to change the way that the harbor was managed. That in 20 years we would be able to swim in the harbor; that we could save 8,000 acres of the Meadowlands. People thought I was nuts. When I asked established environmental leaders for help they would say, “Why bother?” They wrote off Newark Bay, the Passaic River and the Gowanus Canal because those are not places that anybody cares about. So I said, “Fuck you then, I’ll do it.” I really didn’t have many people to go to for help, I could try John and Terry. Backer: And we’d say, “How the hell do we know?” Willner: Exactly. The best advice I ever got from these two was, don’t bother me anymore, just go figure it out. There are some things that we know work, having lawyers helps, having a good relationship with scientists helps. On the other hand, I was the one with experience running boats on the harbor. Cronin: One of the things that the early programs had in common was a tight focus on issues that were not already being tackled. So for us, directly confronting polluters, collecting evidence about violations of the law, responding to citizen complaints, these were things that weren’t being done. One of the most wonderful days was when we held a news conference at the SoNo seafood restaurant in Norwalk, Connecticut. The place was packed with media and lobstermen and fishermen. We announced our lawsuits against sewage treatment plants on Long Island Sound. It was earthshaking not just because of the evidence we had collected and the constituency that cropped up to support us, but because it was simply a new way of doing business — to confront polluters and bring lawsuits. Andy: I had read an article by Derry in The New York Times about protecting the bay. Backer: There’s a subtle difference; I had never read The New York Times. First time I ever opened it was because someone said, “Hey Backer, you’re on the Metro page.” Andy approached John because he wrote me a letter and I threw it in the garbage. Then he wrote me another letter and I threw it in the garbage. He started calling but I didn’t call him back. Finally he just showed up. And I said, now that you’re here I guess you’re serious. Andy: You said, go do things the best way for the harbor. That was the best advice that I ever got. I was left to my own devices. And we must have done something right because within a year I had a boat and, if you could call it that, a salary. Cronin: Terry emerged out of nowhere. We got pulled into doing this work on sewage treatment plants on Long Island Sound in Connecticut. We held a press conference and immediately started talking about a Long Island Soundkeeper. Somewhere over the course of that work it became very obvious that Terry Backer should be the Soundkeeper. Terry emerged as a natural born activist who was willing to take on the commitment without a treasury or organization, with a boat that came to us under questionable circumstances. Backer: I think I ended up having to pay for that boat, eventually. But it underscores the interconnectedness of these three bodies of water. The fish that move through here, the striped bass, many times they are the same individual fish. The people share a maritime history. So it was a natural fit for us. Cronin: Remember the very first newspaper ad we took out? It was the weekend of the Norwalk boat show, full page — IF POLLUTION PUT MAYORS Backer: That bought me friends and enemies. They said we were ambulance chasers; we were just looking for headlines. But the public seemed to understand that we were talking about people’s lives. The truth could not be hidden. Cronin: It was the National Alliance of River, Sound and Bay Keepers. Backer: I’m talking to John one day and he says, “Well, you should really get a computer.” And I said, “John, I really don’t know anything about computers.” I used to sit in that old oyster house at night with a mechanical Remington typewriter, a guy who couldn’t type, couldn’t spell and certainly couldn’t construct a grammatically correct sentence. I sat up there pecking away with two fingers. I remember there was some mayor who said to me, “You know Backer there’s a reason they say that you can’t fight City Hall.” I looked up and said, “Listen pal, with a box of 20 cent stamps and a typewriter I’ll make your life miserable.” Cronin: The people who start Waterkeeper programs make substantial sacrifices to do it. It was risky, we didn’t know if we were going to have a job in six months or a year. As a result, maybe even more important than dedication and commitment, was a sense of fun; a sense of being a joyful warrior. That was very characteristic of all the early programs. There wasn’t a lot of worrying about success or failure. It was more, let’s go out and clobber the bad guys. Andy: I remember the first time I stood up at a public meeting and said, “I’m Andy Willner and I’m the Baykeeper.” The place went silent. “What the hell is that?” Cronin: In those days when Terry introduced himself as the Long Island Soundkeeper or Andy as the New York/New Jersey Baykeeper, it was the first time anyone had ever heard the work “keeper” attached to water. When we first went through the trademark process for our names there were some challenges, but it was easy to prove that the first time “Riverkeeper” entered the American lexicon was on the Hudson River. But it sounds like something that has been around for generations. What’s terrific is when you fast-forward to 2008 it has mainstream acceptance. Backer: To me it seemed like almost too much to claim to be. I called John and asked him if I should use my title and he says, “Well yes, you have to.” Cronin: That’s like calling yourself the pope. It’s a mouthful. At the heart of that dilemma is also the success of the idea. It’s citizens declaring that they have the right to appoint someone to be their eyes and ears, to be their witness, to represent them and to enforce the law. It is one of the simplest, most elegant ideas to ever come out of the environmental movement. Andy: I’ve had very few people in the community question the title and organization. It was the agencies who would say, well who appointed you? And I would say, essentially, I appointed myself. But after a couple years I had a posse, I had people who backed me up. Backer: When you do the job right, and you don’t exaggerate — and usually you don’t have to because the truth is bad enough — you take on an air of credibility that people prescribe to government. Why they would prescribe it to government I don’t know, but they do. Cronin: I can’t imagine what it was like taking two paragraphs from Bob’s book, which is what started this whole thing, and making a movement out of it. Looking back, it’s remarkable. Willner: So where will Waterkeeper Alliance go from here? The selfish answer is that it is up to someone else. We form the basis of the tradition, but we can’t tell the next leaders where to go. Waterkeeper will fail or succeed, and I think it’s going to be extraordinarily successful. Backer: If in ten years it’s the same as it is today, then I would suspect that it’s a failure. But my sense is that there’s a guiding principle: It’s about people’s lives; it’s about making this a better place. Cronin: History judges the success of revolution by whether the revolution becomes the mainstream. The challenge for any revolutionary idea is whether it can still have the imagination and courage it had when it imagined the revolution in the first place.
|
|