Most of us greet spring rains with anticipation of
the fruits of the season – greenery and growth, flower buds and
the awakening of the world around us. But there are a few, like Waterkeepers,
who cringe. This stormwater will pick up pollutants from roofs, roads,
and lawns and carry them into our streams and lakes on a massive scale.
Stormwater runoff is widely recognized as the single largest threat to water
quality in the United States, whether in rural or urban settings. Rain is not
the problem. But the pollution that rainwater picks up as it runs over manmade
surfaces closes our beaches and poisons our drinking water. Surges of rainwater
that are channeled directly into our waterways through stormdrains increase
the magnitude of floods, and the severity of droughts. Stormwater runoff alters
the amount, quality and temperature of water in our rivers and lakes. Stormwater
runoff fundamentally changes the natural circulation of water – the hydraulic
cycle that most people learned in elementary school.
For centuries people have traveled to upstate New York to Chris Navitsky’s
waterbody, Lake George, to escape the pressures of the city and enjoy the beauty
of the lake and its watershed. The lake drives a thriving regional economy,
and the development pressure for homes and commercial space is enormous. But
the impact of runoff from these new buildings and roads is a huge threat to
Lake George.
Twenty years ago a study by US EPA concluded that the water
quality of Lake George was exceptional. At that time less than 5 percent
of the area around Lake George was developed. However, EPA warned that
unchecked development in the watershed would cause a significant decline
in water quality within a twenty-year period. The 1983 study recommended
that public officials, developers and homeowners take steps to reduce
the impacts of development by using structures that keep rainwater closer
to where it falls for longer – this is called stormwater management.
The study’s predictions were proved correct in the early 1990’s
when public beaches on Lake George were closed for the first time during
the peak summer tourist season due to high bacteria counts.
The water in Lake George gets there by one of three routes.
Some falls directly onto the lake surface as rain or snow. Some soaks
into the soil and seeps slowly through the ground into the lake. And
some rainwater or snowmelt flows over the surface directly into the lake.
The amount of water falling directly into the lake doesn’t change.
But development can drastically reduce the amount seeping into the groundwater,
diverting into drains and streams. This is runoff. When water flowing
over the surface picks up pollutants from the ground, now you have polluted
runoff.
Rainwater rolls quickly off roads, parking lots, roofs,
lawns and other developments. In fact, these structures are usually designed
specifically for that purpose. Construction sites can be the most disturbed
landscapes and the largest contributor to the problem – nearly
everyone has passed a construction site and seen thick muddy water running
off the site into a city drain.
Natural landscapes slow water down, holding it close to
where it falls, and allowing it to seep into the ground. This isn’t
just wetlands but the complex natural depressions, sponge-like soil and
vegetation of a natural forest floor, meadow or any undisturbed area.
Trees and plants take up much of the water.
The rule of thumb is this: slowing the rate of surface
runoff allows more of the rain water to infiltrates into the ground and
be absorbed by plants. The slower the flow of water, the fewer pollutants
the water picks up and the cleaner downstream rivers and lakes remain.
Over two days Don McEnhill, Russian Riverkeeper, measured sediment levels in
Foss Creek, California. Then, in less than an hour, as a brief but heavy
rainstorm passed through the area, the turbidity of the water spiked over
1600%. The clear stream water turned a choking murky-brown. Driving around
the upper portion of the creeks watershed, McEnhill found the source of the
slug of mud in the creek: failed erosion controls at a construction site.
The brown muddy water running off construction sites is
not an unfamiliar sight anywhere in the U.S. But the consequences are
more severe than most people usually consider. The sediment flows downstream,
settling into the spaces between the gravel and smothering the fish eggs.
In the case of Foss Creek, this includes endangered Steelhead Trout and
Chinook and Coho Salmon. It clogs the gravel that serves as the natural
drinking water filter for over 700,000 residents of this watershed in
Northern California. The sediment-laden stormwater runoff also carries
nutrients that cause nuisance algae blooms in the Russian River.
The first rains after the long, dry Northern California
summer are critical for water quality. That’s why each year, Russian
Riverkeeper and hundreds of volunteers conduct the Russian River First
Flush. This region-wide stormwater monitoring survey measures pollutants
at 36 urban creek sites. The First Flush project trains volunteers to
monitor streams for 22 pollutants associated with stormwater runoff.
What they find is astonishing. In 2002, they measured the pesticide Diazinon
exceeding EPA toxicity criteria in 33 out of 81 samples taken. In 2003,
they measured the nutrient Phosphate at 2 1/2 times the water quality
objectives in more than half the samples, and saw dissolved copper exceeding
objectives more than a third of the time.
There is no heavy industry in Healdsburg, known for its
quaint town square, rolling vineyards and wineries. But the stormwater
runoff reaching local streams is as dirty as discharge from an industrial
plant. Monitoring water quality is a crucial step in making people aware
of just what pollutants are reaching their streams. “When I moved
into our new office on a side street last fall, I watched an employee
of the florist next door dump a pail full of liquid fertilizer down the
storm drain,” says McEnhill. “I asked her if she knew that
it was less than 25 feet from that drain to Foss Creek and showed her
the “no dumping” plaque on the storm drain. She got the point
and we smiled.”
|
|
Educating public officials, developers and the public on the need to reduce
the impacts of stormwater runoff is one of the biggest challenges Waterkeepers
face. Just ask Michael Mullen. Mullen is a Certified Professional in Erosion
and Sediment Control. He is also the Choctawhatchee Riverkeeper.
The Choctawhatchee River runs through Lower Alabama and the Florida panhandle.
As Choctawhatchee Riverkeeper, Mullen patrols the Alabama portion of the watershed.
The biggest threat to water quality in the watershed is excessive sedimentation.
The sediment in the water is coming from bad agriculture practices (any local
farmer will tell you that soil shouldn’t wash off of fields every time
it rains), poor forestry practices, unpaved rural roads, stream bank erosion,
and construction site runoff. Although only a small portion of the land area
in the watershed is urban, development in these areas causes significant impact
to the Choctawhatchee River and its tributaries.
Mullen first became interested in stormwater while he was
standing in a light rain storm watching muddy water run down the street
from a neighbor’s newly built home in 1999. As he began to look
around with a critical eye, he noticed that erosion and sediment controls
on construction sites were rare, and even where they did exist they were
generally poorly employed and inadequately maintained.
It wasn’t long before a new subdivision, Prospect
Ridge, started on an extension of his street. Mullen says that from the
initial land clearing activities, Prospect Ridge was a small-scale environmental
disaster. “At the start of the project little was done to catch
the water running off the newly cleared site on the street where it entered
storm drains and nearby Big Creek. Inadequate silt fences were erected
to catch sediment-laden water before it reached stormdrains, but they
were not properly located or maintained. Over the course of the project
the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) issued warnings,
and issued several violations against the developer. However, little
if any improvements were made on the ground.” For several years,
the site remained in noncompliance with its construction stormwater permit.
And after each rainstorm the streets near the project were filled with
sediment and muddy water.
Finally, in January of 2004, ADEM issued an administrative
order that included a civil penalty of $4000 against the developer. But
by this time the first phase of the subdivision was almost entirely complete.
In the end, the penalty was substantially less than it would have cost
the developer to implement needed erosion and sediment control measures
throughout the project. The developer did install devices on storm drains
to address remaining problems, but Mullen says even this was done improperly – with
gravel filters that were too small to work properly
The good news is that preventing polluted stormwater runoff is well within the
grasp of every community in the United States. Stormwater management is a growing
field that is gaining currency with city officials, public health experts and
developers.
In the late 1980’s engineers started to recognize the
importance of slowing down stormwater and began designing structures patterned
after natural landscapes. These new designs are often called “Smart
Growth.” These designed landscapes and structures more closely mimic
nature and the natural flow of water. For example, instead of installing
curbs that collect stormwater and send it flowing over warm pavement into
a drain, runoff can be directed into grass swales that allow infiltration
into groundwater, removing pollutants through contact with vegetation,
and reducing the temperature of the runoff.
Mike Mullen says, “Construction sites are not difficult
to stabilize at relatively low cost if the developer utilizes appropriate
and widely used erosion control technologies. Unfortunately, too many projects
don’t do anything to stop erosion and control water and sediment
from running off the site into nearby waterways.”
In housing and commercial developments runoff can be managed
using basins, retention ponds or constructed wetlands that keep water on
the site. These structures give sediments and pollutants time to settle
out of slow moving water. They allow time for the biological activity of
plants and bacteria to clean the water of nutrients, pollutants and even
toxic metals. Water is filtered slowly back into the water cycle – through
groundwater, into streams and back into the air by evaporation from the
surface and from plants.
As with any project, the best stormwater management plan
on paper will only be as good as its design, construction and long-term
maintenance.
Fortunately, the Clean Water Act offers everyone a remedy.
Citizens can petition state environmental agencies to require developers
to get stormwater permits that make clear what technologies they must use
to control polluted runoff from a site. They can also file suit in federal
court.
As for Foss Creek, McEnhill presented pictures of the problems
to the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s enforcement office
who promised to follow-up with the developer to fix their erosion controls.
Three months later the developer had not taken any action to fix the situation
at the site. Polluted runoff from the site continued to exceed water quality
criteria by several hundred times. McEnhill spoke with the regulators again
and was told that because no strict numeric water quality criteria exist,
it would be difficult to enforce against the developer that polluted Foss
Creek. “It’s like having a speed limit posted as ‘Don’t
go too fast’ instead of ‘65 miles an hour,’” says
MacEnhill. “It is difficult to hold a speeder accountable to such
undefined limits.”
That’s why McEnhill is pushing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
to adopt numeric water quality criteria for construction stormwater pollution.
Waterkeeper Alliance and the Natural Resources Defense Council recently sued
EPA for failing to adopt such requirements.
Meanwhile, residents in upstate New York continue to enjoy the stellar clarity
of Lake George. On a sunny day the bottom can still be seen clearly 28 feet
down. Lakekeeper Chris Navitsky’s challenge is to change the attitude
of many who believe that this tough old lake can continue to take care of itself,
as it has for years. Navitsky knows better. He will continue to educate his
neighbors. He will draw on the successes and experience from across the Waterkeeper
movement to convey the message that if we take clean water for granted, we
can lose it and all that it offers our communities.
— Chris Navinski, Don McEnhill & Mike
Mullen contributed to this story.
America’s number one water pollution problem. EPA reported in 2002 that
45% of our waterways are too polluted to support basic uses such as swimming
and fishing. In 2004 the Congressional Research Service (Congress’ in-house
scientific experts) reported that 50% of water pollution problems in the U.S.
are attributed to stormwater runoff – pollution from agricultural lands,
forests, construction sites and urban areas that is washed from the air and
land in rain or melting snow.
The damage caused by stormwater runoff is largely incremental – not as
evident as the brown water pouring from an industrial pipe or black smoke from
a power plant. There is usually no single project, no single polluter to blame.
The best solution to stormwater runoff, then, is to address the problem where
it falls.
Pollutants in stormwater runoff are substances that accumulate on paved – or
impervious – surfaces during dry periods and are washed
into waterways by rainfall:
• Oil, gas, grease and other residues from automobiles and gas stations,
including cadmium from tires and asbestos from brake linings
• Metals such as copper, lead, and zinc from abandoned mines, industrial
sites, building and paving materials, and industrial farms
• Chemical spills and chloride used to deice roads
• Animal and human waste from leaky sewage and septic systems
• Fertilizers and pesticides
• Sediments and soils washed from construction sites, farm fields, lawns
and river banks
• Trash
The National Academy of Sciences attributes 85 percent of man-made oil pollution
in North American oceans to consumption-related spills, largely leakage at
automobile refueling stations and improperly maintained cars and trucks.
Disturbed landscapes can increase the flow of water during a storm two to five
times compared to the flow from natural areas. Greater volumes of water traveling
at greater speeds mean the water carries with it more sediment and pollutants.
Faster water causes damage to stream banks and downstream structures. In addition
to the more dangerous floods, come more severe droughts. The reduction of natural
infiltration into groundwater reduces the water table – the steady source
of most streams during dry weather. More of the water that falls upstream rushes
downstream with the storm surge, leaving less for plants and reducing the natural
reservoirs of water that ensure a consistent supply of clean water. These impacts,
along with the warming of water (which any trout fisherman recognizes as a
major problem) also destroy aquatic habitat.
While bureaucrats blamed the flooding in New Jersey and Pennsylvania in early
spring 2005 on snow melt and Mother Nature, most of the damaged structures
were located in floodplains. Respecting the floodplain of large rivers is even
more important with increasing development. When you strip away plants and
trees, rain that once soaked into the ground now races off the land, swelling
the nearest waterway. Floodwaters rise higher and faster than they used to,
making larger floods from smaller storms.
|
Choctawhatchee
Riverkeeper
Troy Industrial Park |
Most stormwater that falls on city streets, building roofs, and
yards is diverted into stormdrains that run directly into natural streams.
Unlike sewer water, which is piped to a treatment plan, polluted stormwater
runoff is connected, through a pipe to a stream – essentially the
highest reach of every river, lake and coast.
There is an extraordinarily wide range of tools available to prevent
or reduce polluted runoff. Each tool fits a particular problem. When
a stormwater expert says “best management practice,” they are talking about finding the best tool we have for preventing polluted runoff from a particular source. The tool can be a physical structure – something as simple as a hay bale used to block sediment from leaving a construction site, or as complicated as a filter to remove petroleum from water. It can be a practice – like picking up after your dog on a walk, or your town’s street-sweeping program. The tool can be the design features of a building and it’s
landscaping. The toolkit of these practices continues to grow as new
ways of addressing this problem are developed.
Waterkeeper Alliance and partner NRDC have filed a lawsuit challenging
US EPA’s failure to issue regulations to reduce stormwater pollution
from construction and development sites. Runoff from construction sites
and newly paved developments is one of the leading sources of water pollution
in the U.S. EPA decided last year to not issue regulations to control
this pollution, claiming, in an Orwellian twist, that it was complying
with its legal obligation to issue new rules by not issuing rules.
Stormdrains collect rainfall and carry it directly to the nearest waterway. This water does not go to a treatment plant; it does however collect an assortment of pollutants and trash on the way. This pollution flows directly into the nearest river, stream, lake, estuary, beach, harbor, or ocean. Even a simple act can have a large impact on what ends up in that waterway the next time it rains. Here are some simple things we can all do to help prevent stormwater pollution:
• Never tip oil, paint or chemicals down the stormdrain – it takes
only one quart of oil to contaminate a thousand tons of water.
• Animal droppings contain bacteria that can make you sick. Always pick
up droppings left by dogs to prevent them from washing into waterways and onto
beaches.
• Don’t litter. One burst of rain can wash plastics bags, food scraps, cigarette butts, cans and other litter into the stormdrain – and
into your stream.
•Recycle used motor oil and other hazardous household wastes.
•Sweep sidewalks and gutters rather than hosing them down.
•Avoid using chemicals to wash your car. Try a brush and a little elbow
grease instead.
|
Cate White |