Pollution is the irresponsible
disposal of waste. Doing business, producing goods, and simply living
produce wastes. Eliminating waste from our society is impossible. But
eliminating pollution is simply a matter of owning up to the waste
we generate.
Companies, farmers, municipalities and industries act responsibly when they reduce or eliminate pollution. When they don’t, they force the rest of us to carry their load – a load that is a drain on the economy and a danger to our health and communities. The Enemies of the Environment highlighted in this section are some of the most irresponsible companies, public officials, scientists and lobbyists who are leading an unprecedented attack on the American people.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone that illegal dumping of toxic waste
is a major problem. Few disagree that midnight dumping – backing
a truck up to the water’s edge and emptying its vile contents – is
a crime. But toxic chemicals also take a second, equally insidious path
into our waterways.
Under the Clean Water Act, state and federal agencies
can grant a company or municipality permission to discharge their pollution – including
sewage, heavy metals, cancer-causing chemicals – into public waterbodies.
Congress included this permitting system in the Clean Water Act to control
pollution while polluters figured out how to meet the larger national
goal of “zero discharge” into our nation’s waterways.
But granting companies permission to pollute has resulted in the de facto
legalization of this pollution – while midnight dumping is illegal,
daylight discharging with a permit is not.
Companies should pay all the
cost of bringing their goods to market. Keeping waste out of the environment
is simply the cost of doing business. But these companies are using
our natural rivers, streams, lakes and coastal waters as dumping grounds
for industrial wastes: (NYSE: AKS), led by James L. Wainscott,
has the distinct (dis-)honor of being the single largest reported discharger
of toxics to water nationwide. Their Rockport, Indiana operation discharged
an astonishing 29,680,083 pounds of toxins to the Ohio River. Though
named one of America’s Most Admired Companies by Fortune Magazine,
how truly admirable can a company be when they are poisoning our water?
(NYSE: BASF) is directed by U.S. CEO Klaus
Peter Löbbe.
Their Freeport, Texas, chemical plant is the second largest single reported
discharger of toxins to surface water in the U.S., releasing 15,945,553
pounds of toxins into the Clute Lake Jackson Drainage Channel and the
Brazos River. The German-based chemical company reported discharging
toxins to 11 different waterbodies in eight states. Maybe BASF should
change their tagline to “We don’t make a lot of the products
you buy, but we do make a lot of the water you drink polluted.”
(privately held), headed by Warren
R. Staley, and their subsidiaries are a triple threat – high
number (11) of facilities discharging toxins, high number (10) of waterbodies
polluted, and total pounds (almost 12 million) of toxins discharged.
Cargill is a multibillion-dollar industrial agriculture corporation,
which translates to big yields and big money for them, but big pollution
for all of us.
(NYSE: DOW), and their subsidiaries
under the guidance of Andrew N. Liveris, discharge a whopping 97 different
toxins to 16 different U.S. waterbodies, including a total of 606 pounds
of the incredibly dangerous dioxin. There is no known safe exposure
limit to dioxin and it bioaccumulates, working its way up the food
chain and passing from mother to child in the womb and through breast
milk. So much for “Living.
Improved daily.”
(NYSE: DD), with Charles O.
Holliday, Jr. at the helm, continues to discharge PCBs to the Delaware
River, even though this highly toxic substance is banned. In addition,
Du Pont, in conjunction with the U.S. Army, is planning to discharge
VXH, a form of caustic nerve gas, into the Delaware River. It will take
one of Du Pont’s “miracles of science” to undo the
damage that it has done to American waterways.
(NYSE: XOM) is the company that brought us the Exxon-Valdez
oil spill in Alaska. Under the direction of CEO Lee R. Raymond this dinosaur
continues to poison our waterbodies with mercury, a neurotoxin, and MTBE,
a potential human carcinogen. This petroleum powerhouse weighs in with
25 facilities releasing 47 different kinds of toxins into 25 different
U.S. waterbodies.
(NYSE: GE), controlled by CEO
Jeffrey R. Immelt, is notorious for their legacy of PCB contamination
of the upper Hudson River. They’ve spent millions on a campaign to avoid cleaning up
this mess. They lead the pack with the largest number of facilities discharging
toxins to surface water. Despite being named one of Working Mother’s “Best
Companies to Work For,” we think most working parents wouldn’t
want their kids playing in GE’s toxic playground.
(NYSE: MON) and CEO Hugh Grant continue
their horrifying tradition as the manufacturer of Agent Orange and
now banned PCBs, producing herbicides and pesticides that contaminate
water all over the U.S. and the world. Not only are their products
dangerous, they take top dishonors for discharging the largest variety
of toxins (97) to our waterways. While Monsanto has undergone considerable
corporate restructuring, they haven’t stopped “imAgining” new
ways to poison our water and our communities.
(NYSE: TSN), led by CEO John Tyson,
is an industrial agriculture giant. Tyson’s 23 facilities discharge toxins to 24
different waterbodies. The largest chicken producer and beef supplier
in the U.S. likes to keep it big – including the 18,424,001 pounds
of toxins they discharged to U.S. waters in 2002. Even though Tyson thinks
it’s “what your family deserves,” we actually think
your family deserves better.
(NYSE: X), directed by John P. Surma,
Jr., dischages more than 20 heavy metals and other toxins to nine waterbodies
in Alabama, California, Indiana, and Pennsylvania. Their Gary, Indiana,
steel works alone pumps out 2,970,499 pounds of arsenic, chromium,
cyanide, lead, mercury and 18 other toxins into Lake Michigan and three
other surrounding waterbodies. Their long history as the largest steel
producer in the United States would be more impressive if they weren’t
among the largest toxic dischargers as well.
Why these companies? We identified these Worst Corporate Polluters
using the pollution numbers they recorded and reported to U.S. EPA
for the most current (2002) Toxic Release Inventory. We used Environmental
Defense’s Scorecard tool (www.scorecard.org) to screen the data
for the top toxic dischargers to water. We also considered companies’ environmental
record. The CEOs listed are current as of May 1, 2005.
In the 6th century the Roman Empire codified the rights of citizens to
shared resources including air, flowing water and wildlife. These “public
trust” rights descended to the people of the United States following
the American Revolution. Throughout history, however, tyrants have
broken the public trust to deliver these commons to private hands.
The extent of this tyranny in 2005 is, perhaps, at an all time high:
The centerpiece of the President’s administration is the reversal
of more than 30 years of progress restoring America’s environment.
Bush has filled the ranks of his administration with corporate cronies
who are clear cutting environmental and public health protections wherever
they interfere with the wishes of America’s biggest polluters.
Many of these rollbacks are hidden in the minutia of bureaucratic changes,
leaving a facade for the press and public. But the results are real.
More than 400 individual rollbacks damage your family’s health,
our natural areas and our economy. In 2005 alone Bush has:
• Released a new mercury non-control rule,
• Weakened federal cancer safeguards,
• Opened protected areas to development,
• Removed protection for endangered species, and
• Proposed an exemption for oil and gas companies from cleaning up
their polluted stormwater runoff.
As Secretary of the Department of Interior, Gail Norton is supposed to
play the role of the primary enforcer of the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
However, like many other bad actors in the Bush administration, she won’t
be winning any awards for her lackluster performance. As Colorado Attorney
General, Norton argued to the United States Supreme Court that the ESA
was unconstitutional. Her disdain for the ESA has continued as Secretary.
In her first two years at Interior, Norton only added species to the
Endangered Species list AFTER a lawsuit ordered her to do so. Despite
the fact that the ESA directs Interior to protect critical habitat, Secretary
Norton has suspended any further critical habitat designation because,
she says, it provides “little additional protection to species.”
In 2001, Dale Bosworth became Chief of the U.S. Forest Service. Under
his leadership, in 2003 and 2004, courts ruled that the U.S. Forest Service
violated environmental laws 44 times. These violations included eliminating
protections for endangered species, preventing Environment Impact reviews,
and ignoring laws that protect historic sites. Bosworth’s agenda
of “streamlining” agency procedure rarely seems to jive with
public interest or the law.
William Gerry Myers is President Bush’s nominee for Ninth Circuit
Judge, despite having never served as a judge. He began his career as
a lobbyist for the mining and cattle industry, once comparing environmental
regulations to the tyranny of King George III over the American Colonies.
As the Department of Interior’s Chief Attorney from 2000 to 2003,
Myers approved regulations that one federal judge described as “prioritiz[ing]
the interests of miners…over the interests of persons…[who]
seek to conserve and protect the public lands.”
Prior to becoming Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Jeffrey Holmstead worked for the law
firm Latham & Watkins where he represented the interests of the power
industry. Now at EPA, Holmstead is responsible for establishing mercury
limits for power plants. Holmstead is taking every step to remove limits
on mercury emissions from power plants operated by his former clients.
As the chief architect of the administration’s 2005 mercury rule,
he inserted language verbatim from memos prepared by his former colleagues
at Latham & Watkins.
John Graham, Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget, once stated “environmental
regulation should be depicted as an incredible intervention in the operation
of society.” Graham has made a career out of spinning anti-regulatory
rhetoric, junk science and phony economics to serve polluters. In April,
Graham testified at a House hearing supporting the elimination of 76
regulations, including laws that require the disclosure of information
concerning the release of toxins and safety requirements for disposal
of PCBs.
As Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Dr. Diaz classified
formerly public data on the safety of reactors and spent fuel pools.
A scientist at the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) reported that they
have “never encountered such hurdles” releasing crucial information
on the safety of the U.S. civilian nuclear industry. Chairman Diaz recently
traveled to China to promote the sale of a nuclear reactor that had not
yet passed a safety review by his own agency here at home.
As the Chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Inhofe
is strategically placed to grant favors to his corporate friends who
gave him almost half a million dollars in 2002. And he hands out those
favors with fervor. Inhofe denies global warming as a “hoax” and
opposes any attempt to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. His environmental
voting record, compiled by the League of Conservation Voters, is a perfect
zero. Inhofe was the chief sponsor of President Bush’s “Clear
Skies” bill. And, to secure his place as the public’s worst
enemy in the Senate, Inhofe infamously compared the Environmental Protection
Agency to the Gestapo.
Rep. Pombo, Chair of the House Resources Committee, was elected to represent
his rural California district with significant help from agribusiness,
oil and gas, and construction industries. To the delight of property
rights groups, he has set his sights on gutting the Endangered Species
Act and likes to mislead the public by claiming that the law has “a
zero percent rate of success.” Pombo also wants to take away the
public’s access to the courts to enforce environmental laws. Targeting
the so-called “abuse” of citizen suits, Pombo held hearings
last year to undermine the rights of citizens to protect their communities
from environmental harm.
Duncan, Chair of House Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment,
is the leading shill for the transportation industry – he received
more contributions from transportation PACs than from any other sector.
In 2001, he blamed the high gasoline prices on the “rich, yuppie
environmentalists [who] are slowly but surely shutting this country down
economically.” In 2005, Duncan fought off attempts to reign in
the excesses of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and instead pushed
through a pork-loaded multibillion-dollar bill to fund dam construction
and river dredging.
In his infamous 2003 memo on how to blunt the environmental movement,
pollster Frank Luntz instructed polluters and their allies on how to
suppress and marginalize science and scientists when their results
don’t jive with industry’s goals. These mad scientists
are on the frontline of this campaign against the public interest.
Each has made a highly lucrative career out of corrupting scientific
method and attacking their colleagues to bamboozle the public and the
press:
Whelan is the author of Panic in the Pantry and Toxic Terror. In Panic,
Whelan rejects back-to-nature “mania” like organic lifestyles
and pesticide-free eating as a “hoax.” Whelan is President
and founder of the American Council on Science and Health, a group that
asserts “there is no scientific evidence that DDT harms the environment” and
that dioxin, one of the most toxic substances in existence, “was
not such a bad actor.” Whelan has suggested, contrary to a considerable
body of research, “that there is no credible evidence that PCB
exposure in the general environment, in fish, or even at very high levels
in the workplace, has ever led to an increase in cancer risk.”
Paustenbach is the president and founder of ChemRisk, a consulting firm
that helps companies, “confront public health, occupational health,
and environmental challenges.” Paustenbach served as an expert
witness for Pacific Gas and Electric when the utility was sued for allowing
the poisonous heavy metal chromium to leach into groundwater – a
case made famous in the movie Erin Brockovich. In the 1990s, Honeywell,
PPG Industries Inc. and Maxus Energy Corp. were faced with spending nearly
a billion dollars to clean up New Jersey communities they had contaminated
with chromium. Instead, they hired Paustenbach to mount a successful
campaign to force the state to raise the allowable limit of chromium
in soils. Paustenbach has taken his pro-toxic chemical stance nationwide
with his recent Bush administration appointment to the advisory committee
for the Center for Disease Control’s National Center for Environmental
Health.
Giesy is a leading apologist for atrazine, the most common pesticide
used in the United States, and an endocrine disruptor so dangerous that
it has been banned in Europe. When University of California toxicologist
Tyrone Hayes linked tiny amounts of atrazine to deformities and infertility
in frogs, Sygenta, atrazine’s manufacturer, hired Giesy to dispute
Hayes’ research. Despite running faulty studies and misinterpreting
the results, Giesy’s research was widely used by Sygenta and other
pro-industry lobbyists to force EPA to back away from plans to tighten
regulations on atrazine.
Singer is President of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP),
a non-profit policy research group that denies global warming. SEPP is
directly funded by ExxonMobil, according to the company’s own disclosures.
In 2001, Singer denied ever receiving oil industry funding. During the
past two decades Singer has become one of the most prominent “experts” refuting
the existence of global warming and the impact of human activities on
climate change. In 1996, he wrote a declaration arguing that there was
no scientific consensus on global warming and therefore no grounds for
measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Singer claimed the declaration
was co-signed by “more than 100 European and American climate scientists” when
most of the signers were not climate experts, and many were not scientists.
But Singer made it clear that he is not necessarily ready to give up
on global warming. In testimony to Congress he stated “a warmer
climate would be generally beneficial for agriculture and other human
activities.”
This self-styled “leading critic of organic produce” is a
self-righteous attack dog who serves the interests of the corporate agriculture
companies who pay the bills at his “think tank,” the Hudson
Institute. “Organic foods,” Avery claims, “have clearly
become the deadliest food choice.” He gained notoriety by insisting
that people who eat organic food are eight times more likely to suffer
E. coli food poisoning – a figure he claimed to draw from research
conducted by the Centers for Disease Control. But CDC has never conducted
such research. Avery frequently repeats his mantra that there is no hard
scientific evidence that pesticides harm humans, flatly ignoring decades
of scientific analysis. Avery’s “research” has been
paid for by Monsanto, DuPont, Dow-Elanco, Sandoz, Ciba-Geigy, ConAgra,
Cargill, and Procter & Gamble.
The power of persuasion in Washington D.C. is not distributed equally.
Citizens have a fundamental democratic right to petition public officials.
But all too often, their voices are drowned out by slick high-paid corporate
representatives who plague the backrooms and shadowy hallways of Congress
and the White House. This list includes the most dangerous pro-pollution
lobbyists in America:
The National Association of Manufacturers is one of the “Gang of
Six” trade associations with close ties to President Bush. It is
waging a multi-million dollar campaign to secure the appointment of federal
judges who will be antagonistic to the public’s interest in environmental
and health related cases. This unparalleled assault on the independence
of the judiciary reflects the blurring of the line between corporate
and government interests under the Bush Administration. NAM’s position
on the environment could not be made any clearer than the 100% approval
rating that it gave to Senator James Inhofe, the most anti-environment
member of the Senate.
API promotes deregulation of environmental standards for the oil industry.
API claims that environmental safeguards cost billions, but provide no
benefits. It argues that environmental protection policies are based
upon faulty science and scare tactics by the environmental community.
In its most cynical move, API took its propaganda into America’s
schools. API and the publishing house Scholastic developed the “Powering
Your World” website providing 6th-8th grade science curriculum
to teachers that indoctrinates children with their pro-oil, pro-plastic
agenda. The website fails to mention the environmental and health problems
associated with oil spills, air emissions or plastic toxicity. API has
also funded a major study that discounted human-induced climate change
and teamed up with Project Learning Tree (an industry propaganda effort
masquerading as an educational resource) to develop a teaching curriculum
that minimizes the threat of global warming.
This new lobbying firm brings together the axis of anti-environmental
evil. Andrew Lundquist headed Vice President Cheney’s secretive
energy task force that promoted an oil and coal-first approach to U.S.
energy policy. George Nethercutt is a former U.S. Representative who
supported drilling in ANWR and stood firm against implementing provisions
of the Kyoto climate change accord. He once waited around the Capitol
until midnight to sneak an anti-environmental rider into a bill. The
rider had earlier been tossed out by a sizable margin. The most venal
addition to this trio is former Deputy Secretary of the Environment J.
Steven Griles. Prior to joining Interior in 2000, Griles was a lobbyist
for the National Mining Association and Shell Oil. During his tenure
Griles stayed cozy with his former clients, using his position to undermine
the authority of the very agency he ran and continuing to receive $284,000
each year he served as a “public servant” from his former
fossil fuel lobby firm.
Working in concert with the Bush Administration the National Mining Association,
and its well-funded members forced through a change in federal law to
allow “mountain top removal” coal mining. This practice,
approved by agencies filled with industry cronies, allows coal companies
to reach underground coal seams by using explosives to tear off the top
of mountains, and burying adjacent stream valleys under millions of tons
of rubble and waste. More broadly, NMA has successfully opposed other
environmental and safety regulations of mines, particularly in poor areas
of Appalachia. Under the guise of sound science, former National Mining
Association lobbyist Steven Griles corrupted environmental impact studies
on the effects of mountain top removal, ordering agency scientists to
ignore evidence of harm to ecosystems and endangered species.
The National Association of Home Builders is a rabid opponent of laws
and regulations that protect wetlands from destruction, that require
treatment of polluted stormwater from construction sites, and that protect
endangered species and their habitats. They use lawsuits to rollback
the reach of the Clean Water Act so small streams and wetlands can be
bulldozed with impunity. Home Builders fights vigorously to undermine
the government’s ability to protect communities, public health,
and the environment. They want to exempt developers from taking responsibility
for the costs of development. They work to shackle the public’s
ability to protect itself and its natural resources from wanton development
and degradation.
|
|